Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Philip Sekulic vs Ricardas Berankis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sekulic vs Berankis analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Sekulic vs Ricardas Berankis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sekulic 0 - 0 Berankis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sekulic has won 49.46% of points on his second serve, while Berankis has won 50.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sekulic, in recent form, has won 49.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Berankis has won 53.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.88% and 32.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sekulic has saved 63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Berankis has saved 60.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sekulic has won 54.43% of matches played (W/L 43/ 36), with Berankis winning 56.9% (W/L 33/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sekulic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Berankis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 218/ 107), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 66/ 65).
- Player level: In the last year, Sekulic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 25/ 25), where as Berankis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sekulic has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.78 while Berankis has played against players with an average rank of 328.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sekulic has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Berankis has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sekulic has converted 42.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Berankis has converted 40.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sekulic 0 - 0 Berankis
257
Rank
257
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
324
Rank
50
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
55% (90-73)
Career Total W/L
60% (577-383)
47% (14-16)
YTD W/L
63% (22-13)
$92,390
Career Prize Money
$2,395,158
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Philip Sekulic | Ricardas Berankis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (14/16) | 63% (22/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (34/37) | 56% (49/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (349/350) | 53% (436/391) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 52% (14/13) | 63% (12/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (10/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 122 | 121 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 99 | 96 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:5 | 1:40:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 315.4 | 270.66 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1385/2303) | 59% (1447/2464) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (953/1385) | 70% (1014/1447) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (454/918) | 50% (510/1017) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (83/196) | 40% (109/270) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (839/2206) | 41% (1036/2545) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (14/14) | 61% (20/13) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (14/30) | 62% (21/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 64% (9/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 69% (11/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 85% (20/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 15% (20/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 33% (15/5) |
Philip Sekulic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Philip Sekulic
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Remy Bertola
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
54%
(
70 of
129)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
53 of
129)
119
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Brandon Holt
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
58 of
110)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Philip Sekulic
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
14
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
87
Total Points Won
88
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Andrew Fenty
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
4
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Philip Sekulic
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
36 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Federico Cina
53%
(
51 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
11
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Philip Sekulic
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ricardas Berankis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ricardas Berankis
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Antoine Escoffier
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Brandon Holt
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Ricardas Berankis
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
107)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Ricardas Berankis
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
46%
(
23 of
50)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
5
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Ricardas Berankis
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sekulic Vs Berankis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
